QOLiberation

Indianapolis invented something, and almost no one will tell you whose idea it was, because the telling is the whole fight. In the years around 2008 this city brought hundreds of residents in neighborhood after neighborhood into rooms and asked them to name their own future. Not consultants naming it. Not a downtown agency naming it. The people who lived on the block, naming what they had and what they wanted, in their own words, with their own hands on the paper. They called it a quality-of-life plan, and it was, for a moment, a genuinely radical thing, because for one moment the authorship of a neighborhood's future was placed where it always belonged, with the neighborhood. I was in those rooms. I helped run that engagement. I designed the matching award that let a block report its own progress in its own photographs. I am not telling you this from the outside. I am telling you because the thing we built was real, and because I have watched what was done to it, and because I know now what it was always capable of being instead.

Here is what they will tell you the plan is. A resident-driven, asset-based process. Listening sessions and working committees. A shared vision for housing and safety and jobs and schools, written down, with timelines and the names of who is responsible. And every word of that is true, and it is beautiful on the page, and I want you to hold how beautiful it is for one more sentence before I tell you what happened to it, because the betrayal does not land unless you first feel the promise.

What happened is that the plan became a funnel. Eight neighborhoods, eight plans, and one pot of money at the center, held by the same handful of funders and the same city hall, and every neighborhood that authored its own beautiful vision then carried that vision up the funnel and laid it at the same feet, to be ranked, to be rationed, to be compared against the neighborhood down the road that had been told to do the exact same thing. We did not federate. We competed. The process that was supposed to let each community name itself instead set each community against the others for a share of a pool none of them controlled, on a clock none of them set, through a template none of them wrote. It looked like self-determination and it functioned like a grant application. The seam where a neighborhood's story meets power was held, the entire time, by the funder. And a people whose stories all flow upward to the same throne are not a confederation. They are subjects with good manners.

I have written before about how this extracts, how it divides, how the most reflective people inside the structure can name every symptom and never the knife. I am not here to prove that again. I am here because once you have seen the funnel, the only question worth a single hour of your life is the next one. If we built the tool, and the tool was turned against us, can we turn it back. And the answer is yes, and the answer has a name, and the name is older than this city, older than this country, carried here in the blood of the people who settled these blocks, and the name is the thing the empire could never take from a people no matter how much of the land it took. The name is that we own our own story, and a people that owns its own story is already free, and only has to remember it.

My own line runs through the islands, McAleavey and Norvell and Brewer, through Ireland and the borders and the long memory of people who were cleared, starved, shipped, and told their language was a thing to be beaten out of children. And I want to say plainly, before I go one step further, what that history is and what it is not. The Irish were colonized and exiled and they suffered, and that suffering was real and heavy, the famine ships and the cleared glens and the centuries of being ruled by people who did not see them. And it is not the same as what was done to the people stolen from Africa and sold into bondage on this continent. It is not the same wound. The slave ship is not the coffin ship. I will not lay them side by side and call them equal, because they are not equal, and a people founded on empathy does not flatten another people's grief to borrow its weight.

I lay them near each other for one reason only, and it is the reason this whole manifesto turns on. Both peoples survived the unsurvivable by the same means. Not by the land, which was taken. Not by the law, which was never theirs. They survived by keeping the telling alive. The song, the language, the names of the dead, the gift passed hand to hand in the dark, the gathering that the empire could forbid and never quite kill. A field can be occupied. A story cannot. You can take everything a people stands on and you cannot take what they carry, and what they carry, if they keep telling it to one another, is the whole nation, intact, portable, alive. That is what diaspora teaches. The homeland you carry is more durable than the homeland you stand on. And the way you keep it alive is you keep telling it, together, on whatever ground you actually have.

This is why I say Ireland is founded on empathy, and I mean something exact by it, not that the Irish were uniquely good, no people is, but that a people who have been the unseen ones can take that very unseenness and forge it into a covenant. We know what it is to be treated as less. So we will not do it. And we will know it on sight when it is done to anyone else. Empathy not as a feeling but as an inheritance, the hard knowledge carried in the body of a people who were not seen, turned into the one law that matters, which is that we will see each other. That is the founding. Not blood, not soil, not a flag. The seeing. And it is the same founding available to every people who has been run through a funnel and told to compete for the scraps of their own story, which in this city, on these blocks, is most of us.

So here is the move, and it is not new, and that is its power. In 1919 the Irish who had been elected to sit in the empire's parliament simply did not go. They stayed home and they convened their own assembly instead, the First Dáil, and they began to govern, their own courts, their own collections, their own decisions, in parallel, while the official government in London went on holding meetings about a people who had quietly stopped attending. They did not wait to be seated. They did not petition for a fairer share of the empire's chamber. They understood that they were already the authors of their own nation and that the only thing standing between them and self-government was the habit of asking permission. So they stopped asking. The political wing of that long tradition would later be called Sinn Féin, which means, plainly, ourselves, we ourselves. Not against the world. Just ourselves, governing ourselves, at last.

That is the move available to us, and we are closer to it than anyone downtown wants you to know, because the assembly is already half built and it is already meeting, it has just never been told that it is allowed to govern. De'Amon Harges has spent years walking these blocks as a roving listener, finding the gift in every person the funnel marked as a deficit, building the actual map of who can do what for whom, which is the only census that has ever mattered. Mike Mather stood in the pulpit at Broadway and told a room full of us to stop caring for each other and start loving each other, to stop taking over and start turning toward, and then he and De'Amon and a whole neighborhood built the Zawadi Exchange in Mapleton-Fall Creek, a gift economy that sees and connects what people have, which is the best thing I have ever been part of and the working prototype of everything in this manifesto. We already know how to do this. We have done it. We have run a real economy of seeing on a real set of blocks and watched it hold. The only thing we have not yet done is the one thing the Irish did in 1919. We have not yet declared that the assembly is the government of our own lives and stopped sending our story up the funnel to be ranked.

QOLiberation is the quality-of-life process with the seam moved from the funder to the federation. It is the same tool. The same listening, the same asset-mapping, the same residents in the same rooms naming the same gifts. We change one thing and one thing only. The plans no longer flow upward. They flow toward each other. Every neighborhood that has authored its own true telling brings it to a common table, not to be compared and rationed by a stranger, but to be recognized by the other authors, who all remember what it is to be unseen. We pool what we hold. We allocate what we hold ourselves, on our clock. And we present the city not with eight competing requests it can divide and ration, but with one confederated body that has already decided, that governs its own quality of life, and that informs the state of what its people will do. We stop attending the meeting about us. We hold our own.

And to be painfully clear, because the funnel's defenders will reach for the word the moment they feel the floor move, this is not separation and it is not a wall. A people founded on empathy does not build a wall, it builds a table, and it keeps a chair open even for the city, even for the funder, on one condition, that they come as neighbors and not as throne. The door stays open. What ends is the asking. What ends is the habit of carrying our own story up the hill to find out from a stranger whether we are allowed to live it.

An assembly needs a body and a body needs a banner, a thing a person can stand up and declare themselves into, because the Dáil was never only a room, it was a people with a name they could say out loud. So here is the banner, and I have looked at it a long time to be sure it could carry the weight, and it can, because it is the one word power has never been able to steal without becoming something other than power. We are the Love Party. Not a faction, not a grievance, not a method, not an against. Every party this country has ever built was named for a side or a strategy or an enemy. We are naming ours for the only thing that has ever actually held people together, and we are daring the whole machinery of seriousness to be embarrassed by it, because the embarrassment is theirs, not ours. Let love lead the way for once. For once, after every party named for everything but the thing.

And understand what love leading actually abolishes, because this is an abolition and the word is earned. The abolitionists did not ask for a kinder version of the crime. They did not petition for better-managed bondage or a fairer auction. They said the thing itself is the crime and it ends. That is our stance toward the funnel. We are not asking for a better quality-of-life process. We are not asking for a third party that plays the same game one slot over. We are saying the petition is the crime, the upward funnel is the crime, the processing of a beloved person as a deficit is the crime, and love leading abolishes all of it, not by force and not by wall, but by loving the block enough to govern it directly, loving the person enough to see their gift, loving our own people enough to stop asking a throne for permission to live. Love is the abolition. The seeing is the policy. The turning-toward is the whole platform.

So let me tell you what I see, because a manifesto that only diagnoses is just a better-dressed complaint, and we have had enough of those, and because the visions are the seed of the next thing I am building and I want you to hold them with me before they are anything more than light. Here is the city we are already close enough to touch.

That is the future, and it is not a fantasy, it is a memory we have not had yet, the oldest way a scattered people has ever stayed alive, dressed in the clothes of our own city. We built the tool. The city borrowed it to divide us. We are taking it back, and we are turning it toward each other, and we are going to govern our own joy. Ourselves. We ourselves. At last.

And here is the secret of it, the thing that makes the Love Party unlike every party that ever asked for your blood and your attention and your endless metabolizing of the latest outrage. We intend to be the most boring party in the history of this country. No rally you must attend, no enemy you must hate, no fever you must keep refreshing, no thrill manufactured to keep you in the meeting about your own life. Just the slow, dull, holy work of seeing your neighbor and watching the kids and pooling the fund and deciding in one quiet evening what the funnel took eighteen months to ration. Every other party is exciting because the excitement is how it eats you. We are going to be boring on purpose, because a party that feeds on your vibrancy has none left to give back, and we do not want your vibrancy. We want you to keep it. We want to handle the governing so quietly, so unglamorously, so well, that you are freed to go and spend the whole blazing wealth of your one life on the things that are actually alive. The music. The kid crossing the stage. The garden. The person across the table. The band in the basement. The block in the gold of an ordinary evening.

The way to honor our ancestors is to do that where we are. Together. Let love lead the way, for once, and then get quietly out of the way, so love can. Come home to the block you are already standing on.

◆